tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4778905687600416321.post5879266638488755528..comments2023-11-05T02:55:10.230-06:00Comments on Gottesdienst Online: Correcting Some Anti-AntinominanismPr. H. R.http://www.blogger.com/profile/16756503062523543708noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4778905687600416321.post-83290716940653887312017-08-26T12:25:03.049-05:002017-08-26T12:25:03.049-05:00Enjoy your wit, Fr. Eckardt...third use of Gottesd...Enjoy your wit, Fr. Eckardt...third use of Gottesdienst. Funny. Come to think of it... (Wife, did we renew my subscription to Gottesdienst, yet?)William Gleasonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06332292750123949810noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4778905687600416321.post-26461370485729078342017-08-25T18:20:38.095-05:002017-08-25T18:20:38.095-05:00I think this article nails it. Even in the third u...I think this article nails it. Even in the third use the law is accusing ... and it is doing so precisely because it is instructing the Christian. How can there be instruction in righteousness without at the same time accusing the flesh that it is not doing the Law?<br /><br />If the third use is redefined as instructing only, then it is not the “third use” that the Formula is teaching.Martin Diershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14455045241461983409noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4778905687600416321.post-18509365376264950952017-08-25T11:08:36.666-05:002017-08-25T11:08:36.666-05:00Good point, but I don't think it's the iss...Good point, but I don't think it's the issue. The law certainly does more than accuse, though I have occasionally heard 'always and only'. But I prefer to think of the third use of the law as the indicative use: that is, it is descriptive of the Christian life, or better, of the life of Christ in the Christian.Fr BFEhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14554699361739289492noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4778905687600416321.post-53641831349706925732017-08-24T16:05:03.788-05:002017-08-24T16:05:03.788-05:00The law always accuses, to be sure, no argument. ...The law always accuses, to be sure, no argument. But does that mean it ONLY accuses? That seems to be the issue there.Pastor Petershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10653554256101480140noreply@blogger.com